Skip to content

School

“M” Climb and Convocation

"M" Climb and Convocation

About 800 new students here at Mines climbed up Mount Zion this morning at around 8am. We all met at the IM field, sang our school song, crossed 6th Avenue, and the proceeded up the mountain, repeating our song at various checkpoints. It was incredibly amazing watching 800 students exit the IM field and then walk across 6th, all wearing our new green hard hats.

All along the way, we were pelted by upperclassmen with water ballons and sling shots. We finally got to the top and waited close to an hour while the rest of students made their way up the mountain and then bucket-brigaded water to mix the whitewash with. HDNet, Sky Fox 31, and 9News were on hand to record this momentus occasion with the largest class at CSM hauling 10 pound rocks up the mountain to the “M”, the “largest electronically lit school emblem in the world, measuring 104 feet by 107 feet and boasting more than 500 15-watt lightbulbs.” For some bizzare reason, the have charter buses take us back down the IM fied when we’re done.

Later today we had Convocation, the bookend to Graduation. Convocation is the act “to call together to a meeting.” In essence, it’s just some important people talking while we shake our heads and nod.

School Song:

Oh, I wish I had a barrel of rum and sugar three hundred pounds.
The college bell to mix it in and clapper to stir it ’round.
Like every honest fellow, I take my whiskey clear.
I�m a rambling wreck from Golden Tech, a helluva engineer.

A helluva helluva helluva helluva helluva engineer.
A helluva helluva helluva helluva helluva engineer.
Like every honest fellow, I take my whiskey clear.
I�m a rambling wreck from Golden Tech, a helluva engineer.

Hail, hail the gang�s all here.
What the hell do we care as long as we get ourshare?
M-I-N-E-S!
What the hell do we care now?

Note: This picture is not the class of 2008

3.8Mbps

3.8Mbps

Details about my dorm/apartment life will begin trickling in a few days. First off, I have to say that I love it thus far. Second off, I have to say that I just tested my bandwidth and I have over twice the speed of a T1 and easily 10 times faster then my DSL at home. How cool.

7B and a Fat Lady

Well, after much fanageling, I finally got on a flight to Denver. Originally, I was going to fly standby, but the flights were pretty much booked solid. So I used some airline points and got a ticket…next to a fat lady. For all those who don’t know, seat 7B on a 737-300 is the center seat on the left side of the plane. On United, it also happens to be an Economy Plus seat with 17″ of width. This lady was obviously larger then that. She easily extended at least 4 inches into my space (reducing it down to 13″). Her thigh was at least one and a half times bigger then my head. Furthermore, I couldn’t put my arm rest down which prevented me from reclining my seat. The list does go on and I have to admit that times I just wanted to “fall asleep” and plop my head on to her gushy arm…and then start drooling and refuse to wake up until we landed. To some of you (perhaps persons with a BMI over 30) might find this cruel. And it would be cruel if fat people could not control their weight. Yes, I know that some of it is genetics; but I’m talking about the REALLY large people who obviously eat $25 dollars worth on the dollar menu. A poll on Forbes.com shows that 51% of people polled think that airlines should “charge the obese full price for every seat they take up.” I couldn’t agree more. Southwest airlines has had a policy like that in place for almost 25 years. Anyways, at least I’m in Colorado now, although the weather is sucking pretty bad right now. I move in on Friday. Oh crap…

Billings Alumni Get Together

Billings Alumni Get Together

I had an exciting day today. After four years, the Billings Class of 2000 finally meet up again. Turn out was pretty good, all things considered; we had 8 of 12 people show up. Everyone who was there had a great time. We took a tour of the new school and accompanying satellites and then headed down to the Greenlake Bar and Grill for some entres.

I though it was really exciting to see how much everyone had (or hadn’t) changed in the last five years. As a quick note, these shouldn’t not come off as mean or cruel. If they do, I apologize in advance. Starting from the top: Tyler Anderson wins the least likely to change, but changed radically award. It really wasn’t that radical, he just grew his hair out. However, I never would have though Tyler would have done that. Next up is David Barker. David wins the found his inner self award. His change from “food friend” to what I will generalize as Gothic defiantly seems to suit him well. It really seems as if he’s found his place…at least for now. Katherine Latimer wins the most unchanged award. As Hershey’s says, “Change is bad.” So neither is Katherine for that matter: still showing up fashionable late, but always looking her best. It’s really hard to comment on Maya Stessin because I went to high school with her. However, I will give her the steadfast award for all the hardships she has gone through in life. Stephanie Runo wins the shoe size as age award. Stephanie is still up to her crazy antics as usual. Mesa Schumacher receives the hippie award. Granted, she’s not even close to full blown hippiness, but I surmise that it’s just a matter of time ;-). And finally, Adrienne Wilson-Muenchow wins the least unchanged award similar to the above mentioned “most unchanged award,” but different.

I was also named President of Billings Alumni Association. More pictures of the Billings Class of 2000.

A Blast From The Not So Past

I just saw Jessen, Sydney, Freddy, and Nathan (all graduated seniors from SAAS) at Blockbuster. I also saw Maya at Beadworld. It was a very exciting seeing my classmates again, even though it hasn’t even been that long. I suppose it’s day’s like this when you wish you were back in high school again.

Billings Class of 2000 Reunion

We’re having a Billings Class of 2000 Reunion before everyone goes off to college and whatnot. Anyways, I’ve been able to conntact just about everybody. This is going to be really exciting!

Tyler Anderson: Attending

David Barker: Attending

Andrew Ferguson: Coming (duh)

Lindsay Hansberry: Unable to attend

Katherine Latimer: Attending

Ali Messinger: Unable to attend

Niel Radheshwar: Unknown

Sam Ricketts: Tentatively Attending

Maya Stessin: Attending

Stephanie Runo: Unknown

Mesa Schumaker: Attending

Adrienne Wilson: Attending

The last few days

I’ve been keeping pretty busy the last few days. We went paintballing on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday up at our cabin in Estes. On Sunday, I had that problem with BestBuy. Monday I argued with BestBuy Custumer unSupport for at least 30 minutes. Then I went to the bank to deposit some money and change my address. However, the WaMu banking system is divided into three networks: West, Central, and East. My bank account is in the Western network while Colorado is in the Central network. Thus, I couldn’t do my banking here. This was going to be a problem. So I decided just to open a new bank account here. Anyways. I went to Mines to get my EKey so I can log into the network and get access to all sorts of cool stuff. I even have a new email address:
aferguso.[at].mines.[dot].edu

I also managed to obtain my Colorado’s drivers license from the DOL. I’m now also a registered voter in the State of Colorado. Getting my license and even the bank account are the part of the first steps to establish residency. Establishing residency in Colorado is somewhat arduous task. The CRS (Colorado Revised Statue) has an entire section on it (see below). Anyways, there are some big personal and legal questions involved…something that will take lots of time.

Continuing on with my week in review. On Tuesday we went to Water World. I managed to get a little red. Yesterday and today we just hung out. It was nice.

23-7-103. Presumptions and rules for determination of status.

Statute text

(1) Unless the contrary appears to the satisfaction of the registering authority of the institution at which a student is registering, it shall be presumed that:

(a) The domicile of an unemancipated minor is that of the parent with whom he or she resides or, if there is a guardian of his or her person, that of such guardian, but only if the court appointing such guardian (who has legal custody of the minor child as defined in section 19-1-103 (73), C.R.S.) certifies that the primary purpose of such appointment is not to qualify such unemancipated minor as a resident of this state and that his or her parents, if living, do not provide substantial support to the minor child;

(b) Repealed.

(c) (I) A person does not gain or lose in-state status by reason of his presence in any state or country while a member of the armed forces of the United States; but a member of the armed forces may be eligible to obtain in-state status for himself after being domiciled in Colorado for twelve continuous months and complying with the provisions of this article or, notwithstanding the length of his residency, upon moving to Colorado on a permanent change-of-station basis; except that such in-state status shall not be considered in determining limitations on maximum enrollment placed on institutions of higher education in Colorado and such in-state status shall not apply to members of the armed forces of the United States who attend education programs on military bases and such in-state status shall also be subject to the limitations in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (c). A member of the armed forces may also apply for in-state tuition classification for his or her dependent upon meeting the requirements of this section.

(II) The governing board of each institution of higher education may grant in-state tuition status to members of the armed forces or their dependents pursuant to the criteria set forth in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (c); except that, for the purposes of calculating general fund support of said institution in the general appropriation act for the 1986-87 school year, such persons shall not be counted as resident students.

(III) Repealed.

(d) The establishment of a new domicile in Colorado by a qualified person formerly domiciled in another state has occurred if he is physically present in Colorado without a present intention to return to such other state or to acquire a domicile at some other place outside of Colorado;

(e) Once established, a domicile has not been lost by mere absence unaccompanied by intention to establish a new domicile;

(f) The establishment of a Colorado domicile for twelve continuous months in accordance with the provisions of this article by the parent of a parent-qualified student entitles the student to in-state tuition rates;

(g) A minor is unemancipated.

(2) To aid the institutions in deciding whether a student, a parent or guardian of the student, or the person who provides substantial support to the student is domiciled in Colorado, the following rules shall be applied:

(a) Payment of Colorado income tax is highly persuasive evidence of domicile in Colorado. If spouses file income tax returns in different states, the income tax paid to each state may be considered in determining whether domicile in Colorado is proper.

(b) Nonpayment of Colorado income tax by a person whose income is sufficient to be taxed is highly persuasive evidence of non-Colorado domicile.

(c) After a student has registered at an institution, his classification for tuition purposes remains unchanged in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. Such evidence shall be reduced to writing and filed with the registering authority of the college. Changes in classification established by such evidence, whether from out-of-state to in-state or the reverse, shall be in writing, signed by the registering authority of the college, and given effect at the time of the student’s next registration.

(d) A qualified person cannot establish a new domicile in Colorado if he lacks the intention of so doing.

(e) No person may establish a domicile in Colorado solely for the purpose of changing a student’s classification for tuition purposes from out-of-state to in-state. Any student who is classified for tuition purposes as an out-of-state student at the time of registration at an institution and who personally or through his parent, his guardian, or the person who provides substantial support to him seeks to establish Colorado domicile while registered shall be presumed to seek to establish Colorado domicile solely for tuition purposes in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.

(f) The following may be considered evidence of domicile even though no one of these criteria, if taken alone, may be considered as conclusive evidence of domicile:

(I) Employment in Colorado, other than that normally provided on a temporary basis to students by an institution of higher education or other temporary employment;

(II) Ownership of residential real property in Colorado;

(III) Graduation from a high school located in Colorado;

(IV) Continued residence in the state of Colorado during periods when not enrolled as a student or during periods between academic sessions;

(V) Acceptance of future employment in the state of Colorado;

(VI) Vehicle registration in Colorado;

(VII) Any other factor peculiar to the individual which tends to establish the necessary intent to make Colorado a permanent home;

(VIII) Voter registration in Colorado.

(g) The following may be considered as evidence of domicile in another state even though no one of these criteria, if taken alone, may be considered as conclusive evidence of domicile in another state:

(I) Failure to comply with any law imposing a mandatory duty upon a domiciliary or resident of this state;

(II) Maintenance of a home in another state;

(III) Prolonged absence from Colorado, except in military or governmental service or except when the absence is due to a temporary relocation required as a condition of employment which the employer does not intend to make permanent or except when the student has been out of state for less than three years and such student’s parent or legal guardian was and continues to be a resident of Colorado;

(IV) Return to one’s former residence for a substantial portion of the time during periods when not enrolled as a student or between academic sessions;

(V) Vehicle registration in another state;

(VI) Any other factor peculiar to the individual which tends to establish the fact that his permanent home is in another state.

(h) The following may be considered as evidence of emancipation for the purposes of this article even though no one of these criteria, if taken alone, may be considered as conclusive evidence of emancipation:

(I) An affidavit of the parents stating their relinquishment of any claim or right to the care, custody, and earnings of the minor as well as the duty to support the minor;

(II) Entry into the military service by the minor;

(III) Failure of the parents to provide financial support to the minor, coupled with the evidence that the minor is independently able to meet his own financial obligations, including the costs of his education;

(IV) Any other factor peculiar to the individual which tends to establish that he is independent of his parents and is providing his own support.

(i) The following may be considered as evidence of nonemancipation for the purpose of this article even though no one of these criteria, if taken alone, may be considered as conclusive evidence of nonemancipation:

(I) The claiming of a minor as a dependent for the purposes of income taxation;

(II) Receipt of gifts, loans, or trust proceeds from an inter vivos trust by a minor regardless of the date of receipt thereof which the minor depends upon for financial support, whether the gifts, loans, or trusts from which proceeds are paid are made by the parents, any other relative, or a friend of the minor;

(III) Residence in the home of his parents by the minor, except for temporary visits;

(IV) Any other factor peculiar to the individual which tends to establish that he lacks independence and is dependent upon his parents.

(j) The marriage of a minor results in his emancipation.

(k) The establishment of a Colorado domicile shall be the burden of the person seeking to establish domicile. The registering authority of any state institution of higher education shall require the individual seeking to establish domicile to support his claim by clear and convincing evidence of the validity of the claim. The registering authority may require the individual seeking to establish domicile to complete forms prepared by the Colorado commission on higher education for the purpose of aiding him in his determination and to provide such documentation as may be required to support the classification.

(l) Only a qualified person can establish a domicile.

(m) (I) Any person who himself or, if an unemancipated minor, through his parent or legal guardian has had an established domicile in this state for not less than one year shall not be considered to have lost such domicile for tuition purposes unless such person would be classified as an in-state student for tuition purposes in another state if the rules and presumptions in this section for classification as an in-state student were applied in such other state to such person.

(II) Any unemancipated minor whose parent or legal guardian was domiciled in Colorado for at least the four immediately preceding years and whose parent or legal guardian moves from this state shall be classified as an in-state student if:

(A) The parent or legal guardian leaves the state after the minor completes his or her junior year of high school and the minor matriculates at a Colorado institution within three years and six months after the time the parent or legal guardian leaves the state; or

(B) Notwithstanding his or her unemancipated status, the minor maintains continuous Colorado domicile subject to all other provisions of this section.

(n) Participation in an education expense program shall not be considered evidence of domicile in this state or in another state.

(o) A foreign national, notwithstanding an intention to return to his or her country of origin or ineligibility to establish domicile in the United States pursuant to federal law, shall be eligible for classification as an in-state student subject to all other provisions of this section if the primary purpose of the foreign national’s residence in Colorado, pursuant to federal immigration regulations, is other than for his or her education or for the education of a family member. The Colorado commission on higher education shall designate those nonimmigrant classifications under which such foreign nationals may qualify as in-state students. In no event shall said designation displace students who would otherwise qualify as Colorado residents for in-state tuition classification purposes.

(2.5) Repealed.

(3) An unemancipated minor qualifies for a change in his or her classification to in-state student for tuition purposes only if either of his or her parents, regardless of custody or parental responsibilities, or his or her legal guardian has completed the requirements for establishing a Colorado domicile. Eligibility for classification as an in-state student for tuition purposes shall be lost if both of his parents, regardless of custody or parental responsibilities, or his or her legal guardian has lost eligibility. An emancipated minor or adult who has registered as a student does not qualify for a change in his or her classification to in-state student for tuition purposes unless he or she has established and maintained a domicile for twelve continuous months in this state.

(4) Repealed.

(5) The presumptions and rules in this section shall determine tuition classification except when exceptions are made by the general assembly in other sections of this article.

My Tenative Schedule for College

My tenative schedule for college:

Monday:

  • 8-10am – EPICs 151 (Engineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence)
  • 10-11am – MACS 111 (Math/Computer Sciences – Calc for Science and Engineers I)
  • 11am-12pm – CHGN 121 (Chemistry – Principles of Chemistry I)
  • 1-2pm – SYGN 101 (System courses – Earth and Environmental Systems)

Tuesday:

  • 9-10am – PAGN 101 (Physical Activites)
  • 11am-12pm – CSM 101(Freshman Success Seminar)

Wednesday:

  • 8-10am – EPICs 151 (Engineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence)
  • 10-11am – MACS 111 (Math/Computer Sciences – Calc for Science and Engineers I)
  • 11am-12pm – CHGN 121 (Chemistry – Principles of Chemistry I)
  • 1-2pm – SYGN 101 (System courses – Earth and Environmental Systems)
  • 2-5pm – CHGN 121 (Chemistry – Principles of Chemistry I)

Thursday:

  • 9-10am – PAGN 101 (Physical Activites)
  • 10-11am – MACS 111 (Math/Computer Sciences – Calc for Science and Engineers I)
  • 1-4pm – SYGN 101 (System courses – Earth and Environmental Systems)

Friday:

  • 8-9am – EPICs 151 (Engineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence)
  • 10-11am – MACS 111 (Math/Computer Sciences – Calc for Science and Engineers I)
  • 11am-12pm – CHGN 121 (Chemistry – Principles of Chemistry I)
  • 1-2pm – SYGN 101 (System courses – Earth and Environmental Systems)

Mines moon mission may be NASA’s next

From the Rocky Mountain News:

By Jim Erickson, Rocky Mountain News
July 19, 2004

A Colorado School of Mines proposal to collect rocks from the far side of the moon was selected Friday as one of two finalists for a $700 million NASA mission.

The proposed Moonrise mission would send twin robotic spacecraft to execute the first lunar landings since the Apollo program ended in 1972.

Both craft would land in the 1,500-mile-wide South Pole-Aitken Basin. Robotic arms would scrape about 5 pounds of rock and soil into return capsules, which then would head back to Earth.

In January, President Bush outlined a plan to return astronauts to the moon as early as 2015. Robotic missions would pave the way for the manned lunar landings.

“Our mission is consistent with the president’s new vision for exploration,” said Colorado School of Mines geologist Michael Duke, who heads the Moonrise team.

“I think it fits,” he said Friday. “I think we will benefit from the fact that the country’s space program will be focused on the moon for the next few years.”

The South Pole-Aitken Basin soil and rock would be “clearly different from anything we’ve sampled before,” Duke said.

In February, seven proposals were submitted for the next mission in NASA’s New Frontiers program of unmanned solar system exploration flights.

The other finalist announced Friday is Juno, a Jupiter orbiter that would study the giant planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field. The Juno team is headed by Scott Bolton of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

“It was a very tough decision, but we’re excited at the prospect of the discoveries either of them could make,” said NASA Associate Administrator Ed Weiler.

Each of the New Frontiers finalists will receive up to $1.2 million to complete a detailed “implementation feasibility study” in the next seven months. In May 2005, a winner will be named. The selected mission must be ready for launch by June 30, 2010. Costs will be capped at $700 million.