There’s No Kill Switch On Awesome
Never have I felt a Dilbert strip reflect me like this one:

I think I’m going to make that my new motto: There’s No Kill Switch On Awesome
Never have I felt a Dilbert strip reflect me like this one:

I think I’m going to make that my new motto: There’s No Kill Switch On Awesome
I currently have a back log of 1500+ photos dating back to February of last year. My goal was to get them all done by the end of last year, but that obviously didn’t work.
Every summer, I usually get the pleasure of participating in a few Duck Dodge events on Lake Union as part of the crew of the Mata Hari. Paul asked me to take some pictures of them racing though, which was an awesome challenge and opportunity to follow the Mata Hari around the buoys in a Boston Whaler while trying to take pictures, and not hit anyone!
This is also the first chance I’ve had to use VSCO’s film pack for Lightroom…still getting used to it, but I like the way they turned out!
[flickr]6738426631[/flickr]
[flickr]6738453057[/flickr]
[flickr]6738460057[/flickr]
[flickr]6738443795[/flickr]
[flickr]6738444879[/flickr]
[flickr]6738448781[/flickr]
[flickr]6738457817[/flickr]
As usual, you can see more on Flickr: Duck Dodge (6 Sept 2011)
Jeff and Elizabeth were in Washington, DC for the week, but got stuck in made a stop in the wonderful city of Denver on their way back. Jeff asked me:
24 hours in Denver, what should we do?
Here’s my quick and dirty short list of things to do in Denver. I’ve tried order it from north to south, west to east, but this is all mostly from memory.
Anything else worth adding to this list?
From west to east is the Denver City and County building, Civic Center Park, and Colorado State Capital ↩
I’ve been busy with work, but I’ve been keeping my eye on the news. Politics have always been a bit…screwy. I’m not sure if they’re getting more screwier or I’m becoming more aware of what’s going on. – maybe just more cynical.
Representative Lamar Smith and Senator Patrick Leahy now joins the ranks of former Senator Ted Stevens1 in Internet Hall of Shame with his further bastardization of the copyright clause2 with their introduction of SOPA and PIPA
I’ve long rallied against the MPAA, RIAA, and their cronies, and for copyright reform (see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).
SOPA/PIPA is yet another horrible piece of legislation in a growing list of legislation unscrupulously backed by large corporations, and the Supreme Courts expansion of “corporate personhood” in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission doesn’t help either.
It expands the reach of copyright in ways that are detrimental to the very purpose of the copyrights, in particular by hindering the promotion of useful arts. And all this is done at the behest of corporations who, essentially, bribe politicians.
Even more unfortunate, the politicians writing these pieces of legislation — or at least responsible for introducing them, I have no idea if they actually write them — have no idea of the technical ramifications of what they are doing. Would you trust your Congressman to perform surgery on you? There are actually 18 medical doctors3, so you have about a 3.4% chance of standing a chance, but I think in general the answer would be no.
When it comes to technical issues though, of the 535 members of congress, one is a physicist, one is a chemist, six are engineers, and one is a microbiologist4. This is not to say that other members of congress may not be tech savvy, but with the average age of a congressman pushing 60, I’m guessing not so much. Of the 12 original co-sponsors of SOPA, not one has a technical background.
Surely the United States House Science Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, the subcommittee through with SOPA passed, has some technical experts. Nope. Not a single engineer or anyone with experience (as far as I could tell) in computer science. I would expect that people making the such decisions have, you know, actual expertise in those areas — a technocracy.
Anyway, I have poked around the SOPA legislation, and read many different analysis on it. I also do have an engineering degree. And so I feel very confident in saying that SOPA/PIPA is a bad idea from a technological standpoint. I also think’s it’s pretty bad from an overbearing-copyright standpoint, but that’s my personal bias.
In response to what SOPA/PIPA will do to the Internet if passed, I am joining other sites5 to protest SOPA and PIPA and will black out AFdN for all of Wednesday, January 18th, 2012. Any attempts to access AFdN will result in a HTTP 503 Service Unavailable error.
Seriously though, if SOPA/PIPA passes, I may have to take down AFdN lest I avoid getting sued. That’s a bridge I hope to never have to cross. In the meantime, take some time to educate yourself on how the internet works. Ask questions and I’ll try to answer them. And maybe, just maybe, we can make a difference.
Also, while I currently use GoDaddy as my domain name registrar, they supported SOPA and thus I will no longer support them. I’ll have another post on that in the future.
Some, but not all, interesting links:
Everything is a Remix
SOPA Infographic
House takes Senate’s bad Internet censorship bill, tries making it worse
Contact your congressman
Sopa 101: a guide to the USA’s proposed anti-piracy legislation
IP Law Wiki
Stanford Law Review: Don’t Break the Internet
Shit, I used Wikipedia about ten times to look up references for this post. Oh well, see you all Thursday!
“And again, the Internet is not something that you just dump something on. It’s not a big truck. It’s a series of tubes.” ↩
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution: “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” ↩
such as Wikipedia, WordPress, reddit, Google, and BoingBoing ↩
I just spend about two weeks in Montana celebrating Christmas and New Years with Rachel and her family. I got back into Seattle yesterday and Friday morning I’m off to New York for a work trip. I’ll be out there for almost two weeks. I’m not sure how much free time I’m going to have, but I’d love to gather your thoughts on anything I “simply must do” before I leave.
In case it helps, I’m going to be staying in Islip, but will have easy access to common modes of transportation.
Some things on my list already:
What else should I do? Ideally, these are things I can do on a weeknight or weekend and still have me at work early the next morning.
I actually almost didn’t produce a year end zeitgeist because I didn’t have the time to put together all the data. However, Alex King has made it easy this year with his wp-stats code which he has kindly provided on Gist1.
So, I’ve collected the data (although less than I have in years past), crunched the numbers, and have now published the data for Andrew Ferguson dot NET 2011. As always, these stats mean practically nothing. They are fun (and at time, amusing) to look at, that’s it. Enjoy and Happy New Year!
| Posts | Avg. Length | Total Length | Comments (Mine) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 51 | 1,594 | 81,294 | 146 (19) |
| 2010 | 145 | 2,893 | 419,424 | 454 (112) |
| 2009 | 249 | 2,132 | 530,867 | 537 (141) |
| 2008 | 226 | 1,750 | 395,562 | 807 (204) |
| 2007 | 326 | 1,335 | 435,267 | 1,023 (207) |
| 2006 | 492 | 1,237 | 608,725 | 939 (136) |
| 2005 | 763 | 1,189 | 907,495 | 307 (75) |
| 2004 | 227 | 1,194 | 271,074 | 0 (0) |
| 2003 | 66 | 653 | 43,130 | 0 (0) |
| 2002 | 3 | 953 | 2,859 | 0 (0) |
Top Ten Commenters for 2011:
Top Ten Posts for 20112:
Top Ten Search Terms for 20113:
Page views: 177,5866 or 1,613,20678
Hint: add require_once('wp-load.php'); to the beginning of the file and place it to your WordPress directory ↩
as measured by WordPress.com on the andrewferguson.net blog ↩
as measured by WordPress.com on the andrewferguson.net blog ↩
as measured by AWStats for the entire andrewferguson.net domain ↩
traffic viewed, which does not include “traffic generated by robots, worms, or replies with special HTTP status codes.” ↩
as measured by WordPress.com on the andrewferguson.net blog ↩
as measured by AWStats for the entire andrewferguson.net domain ↩
traffic viewed, which does not include “traffic generated by robots, worms, or replies with special HTTP status codes.” ↩
I met Rachel’s friend from college, Laura. Laura has the awesome job of being a researcher at MSU in their ICAL (Imaging and Chemical Analysis Laboratory). Of particular interest was Laura’s job of operating the scanning electron microscope!
So of course I asked if we could have a tour! Not only did we get a tour, Laura even let me operate the machine! Oh yes folks, I got to operate a scanning electron microscope!
The first we used was the Zeiss SUPRA 55VP Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope providing ultra high-resolution at low kV with resolutions of 1.7nm1 at 1.0kV2. Laura had a spider sample prepared and so we decided to use that. Here are some of the pictures I took:
We also got to use the JEOL JSM-6100 Scanning Electron Microscope, which is quite a bit older, but just as cool.
It works a bit different from the FM-SEM, using Secondary Electron Imaging (SEI) and Backscattered Electron Imaging (BEI). Rachel has a stainless steel ring she likes to wear, so we through that in and took a look at it under the scope:
I was pretty much like a kid in a candy store. I had an awesome time and got to add a new item to my Christmas list for next year.
One or more nights were spent in each place. Those cities marked with an * were visited multiple times on non-consecutive days. Roughly in order of appearance.
Seattle, WA*1
Eden, Utah
Passe Catabois, Haiti
Oklahoma City2, OK*
Broomfield, CO*
Leavenworth, WA
St. Regis, MT
Billings, MT*
Smith Rock, OR*
San Diego, CA
Colstrip, MT
Gig Harbor, WA
Mount Baker, WA
Bozeman, MT
I added one new State, Oklahoma.
Chauncey linked to this the other day, and I finally had a chance to read it; I think this is a great conversation to be having:
From teamchauncey.wordpress.com:
It seems to me that many of us Christians are born, raised, and taught with a giant elephant in the room.
That elephant would be sexuality.
Most Christians don’t hear anything about it growing up or if they do it’s an entirely negative frame of reference that only shifts dramatically once the word marriage is attached to it.
I’m unsure how young adults who grow up without healthy conversation regarding sexuality are going to be able to participate in a healthy expression of it.
Chauncey helps kick off the discussion by linking to an article written by Tina Schermer Sellers, “a clinical professor in the graduate Family Therapy Department at Seattle Pacific University and director of their post-graduate certificate in Medical Family Therapy”, called Christians Caught Between the Sheets – How ‘abstinence only’ Ideology Hurts Us:
“The sex affirming Hebraic roots of Western civilization has been masked by Augustine’s legacy of eroticism-hating sexual dualism, perpetuated by authoritarian-rooted Christian dogma, which negated the basic worthiness of human beings. The evolution of Western culture is a history of theologically based sexual oppression.”5
…
“Traditional Christian sexual ethics is not only inadequate in that it fails to reflect God’s reign of justice and love which Jesus died announcing, but its legalistic, apologetic approach is also incompatible with central Judaic and Christian affirmations of creation, life, and an incarnate messiah. Because the Christian sexual tradition has diverged from this its life-affirming source, it has become responsible for innumerable deaths, the stunting of souls, the destruction of relationships, and the distortion of human communities. The Christian sexual tradition uses scripture and theological traditions as supports for a code of behavior which developed out of mistaken, pre-scientific understanding of man, anatomy, physiology and reproduction, as well as out of now abandoned and discredited models of the human person and human relationships.”7
It’s a long read, but I think it’s worth it.